Star Trek (2009)

© Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase  Blu-ray | Digital HD

Director: 
Writers: 
Cast: 
Released:  Friday, May 8, 2009  
Length:  126 minutes
Studio: Paramount Pictures
Genre: Sci-Fi/Fantasy
Rating: Star Trek is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association of AmericaSome material may be inappropriate for children under 13.


Synopsis

Star Trek © Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

The greatest adventure of all time begins with "Star Trek," the incredible story of a young crew's maiden voyage onboard the most advanced starship ever created: the U.S.S. Enterprise. On a journey filled with action, comedy and cosmic peril, the new recruits must find a way to stop an evil being whose mission of vengeance threatens all of mankind.

The fate of the galaxy rests in the hands of bitter rivals. One, James T. Kirk (Chris Pine), is a delinquent, thrill-seeking Iowa farm boy. The other, Spock (Zachary Quinto), was raised in a logic-based society that rejects all emotion. As fiery instinct clashes with calm reason, their unlikely but powerful partnership is the only thing capable of leading their crew through unimaginable danger, boldly going where no one has gone before!

Purchase your copy of Star Trek today atPurchase Star Trek On Amazon

Download Star Trek from iTunes.


Comments

Movie AppCourtesy of Movie Hype App

ampayne71
 I'm going to really try to watch this I'm not feeling good ??????????
10/05/2013 11:07 PM EST

ali121
 Chris pine is sooo good looking don't you think Nathan rose? ??
06/24/2013 9:03 PM EST

sgones23
 Rewatching Star Trek before going to see Into Darkness
05/19/2013 1:24 PM EST
Star Trek images are © Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Captain’s Log Stardate 94477.81, 50 Years of Star Trek  11/16/2016 4:24 PM EST
50 Years of Star Trek is available for Purchase on Both DVD and Digital HDAs I sit in my chair watching the 50 Years of Star Trek DVD (just released everywhere), which was originally aired on the History Channel, I find myself pondering why… or should I say how could anyone try to sum up the Star Trek universe in 1 hour and 24 mins. Seriously! 50 years of STAR TREK!? The original series had 80 epi...  More>>

Anton Yelchin's Character Won't Be Re-Cast in Future Star Trek F...  07/20/2016 12:01 PM EST
J.J. Abrams, producer for the "Star Trek" franchise, said that he won't be re-casting Anton Yelchin's Pavel Chekov character in future films.Abrams said, "I would say there's no replacing him. There's no recasting. I can't possibly imagine that, and I think Anton deserves better."Yelchin died on June 19th in a freak accident outside his home. When asked if they would include the death of Chekov's ...  More>>

Fourth Star Trek Film Announced with Hemsworth Returning  07/18/2016 3:45 PM EST
Paramount Pictures, Skydance and Bad Robot have announced that there will be a fourth "Star Trek" film.  Chris Pine and the rest of the cast will return, as well as Chris Hemsworth as George Kirk.  The following is the press release:HOLLYWOOD, CA (July 18, 2016) - Paramount Pictures, Skydance and Bad Robot today announced that the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise will return to the big screen for ano...  More>>

Idris Elba In Talks to Play Villain in Star Trek 3  03/25/2015 1:06 PM EST
Idris Elba is said to be in talks to star as the villain in "Star Trek 3".  There aren't any details available as to what his character may be, but speculation points to a possible major Klingon presence in this film. The film will once again star Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Simon Pegg, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldana and Anton Yelchin. Justin Lin will be directing, and J.J. Abrams will be producing.Produ...  More>>

Leonard Nimoy Passes Away at Age 83  02/27/2015 12:43 PM EST
Leonard Nimoy, best known for his character on Star Trek as Spock, has passed away today. He was 83.Susan Bay Nimoy, his wife, confirmed the news this morning and said that the cause of death was end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Nimoy's career spanned over 50 years, with Spock being his most notable character.  His other interests included poetry, photography and music. Nimoy is sur...  More>>

Could We See Shatner and Nimoy Cameos in Upcoming Star Trek?  09/23/2014 3:01 PM EST
Roberto Orci, the co-writer for the two recent "Star Trek" films, reportedly would like to have William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy reprise their roles as Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock in the upcoming third installment. Orci will be directing this time around.  There is little known about the plot, except that it will be set during the latter part of the Enterprise crew's five year journey.  If Orci ge...  More>>

J.J. Abrams Grants Dying Fan's Last Wish to See Star Trek Sequel  01/04/2013 4:54 PM EST
J.J. Abrams, director of the rebooted "Star Trek" franchise, gave one fan, named Dan, the wish of a lifetime - to see the sequel "Star Trek Into Darkness."Dan's wife said, "It was truly amazing that a filmmaker so secretive as J.J. Abrams was kind enough to show this to us. It is also so wonderful for his friends & his family to finally hear some good news from us, they know how important film is ...  More>>

Preview of Star Trek Into Darkeness to Debut on December 14th on...  11/15/2012 10:57 AM EST
HOLLYWOOD, CA (November 14, 2012) - Paramount Pictures will release the first 9 minutes from J.J. Abrams' eagerly-awaited "STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS" exclusively in IMAX 3D months prior to the film's official release in May 2013.  This first-look at the movie will play in approximately 500 digital IMAX 3D theatres beginning December 14th. "STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS," the sequel to Abrams' 2009 hit fil...  More>>

Peter Weller Signs on for Star Trek Role  12/05/2011 11:30 AM EST
Peter Weller, star of "Robocop", is going to be joining the cast of the "Star Trek" sequel.  There is no word, as of yet, on what role he will be playing.  He is said to be a "principal" character, however.The original cast will be returning as well the addition of Alice Eve and Benicio Del Toro.This will not be the first time Weller has been a part of "Star Trek". He played in two episodes of "St...  More>>


Star Trek Theatrical Review


Star Trek's promise has always been that it would show us a “for-real Utopian future” where the best voices of mankind have triumphed.  Star Trek’s fans, sometimes reaching religious levels of zeal, have gazed into its holographic crystal ball looking for the fundamental truths of its vision.  There was some actual vision going on also.  For example, Roddenberry's decision, not to use zippers in the 23rd century was the kind of small point that indicates that he was actually thinking hard about the details.  On the other hand, his choice of a racially integrated crew shows his courage and vision with regard to the big picture.

By the time Enterprise rolled around, though, the history was getting thick with what fans call 'canon' (the official history of the show) and what we had seen before the original series, after (Next Gen), way after (DS9), and so on. With ten movies of widely varying quality piled on and uncountable books, comic series (and even an animated TV show) --as well as board games, computer games, and role-playing games, the Star Trek universe was so full of things that any attempt to reconcile it was doomed to failure.  If there ever was a coherent vision of any depth, it was now buried under layers of what might as well have been fan-fiction.

When JJ Abrams decided to re-do it, I admit I was interested, but I was far from sold.  The idea of Star Fleet Academy had been around for years, possibly decades, and a young Kirk and Spock seemed a bit like trying to iron out edges of a story that had mostly already been told.  We know how Kirk dies (badly). We know where McCoy was during the Next Gen maiden voyage.  There was very little that could be said about the Trek universe that had not already been said somewhere else.

Thus, I went into Star Trek with low expectations.  I am pleased to say they were greatly exceeded.  For starters Abrams ditches canon and moves directly to time-manipulation.  I would have thought this was bogus; but in the theater, I decided that it was (a) the cleanest way possible to have a "clean" address of the material, and (b) pretty well in keeping with Star Trek.

What is Abrams trying to do anyway?

Abram's Star Trek (part of a 2009 pattern where the 2009 version carries a minimalist same-name as the franchise starter) is a reboot of the Star Trek universe.  It gives us a time-travel framework for a fresh-start for Kirk (a physical, virile-looking Chris Pine), Spock (a pitch-perfect Zachary Quinto), McCoy (Karl Urban hitting most of the right notes if a little over-emphatically), Uhura (with the beautiful Zoe Saldana bringing as much humanity and dignity to the character as she deserves), Sulu and Checkov (John Cho and Anton Yelchin giving us everything we could ask for there), and Scotty (Simon Pegg being effortlessly hilarious).  Gone are the heavy-handed moral quandaries that the TV show built on for Abram's intuition that what we really want to see is Kirk and Spock team up and gun down a bunch of bad guys.

Surprisingly, it turns out that Abrams is pretty much on the money!  The reboot, to be certain, does not go for a naive shoot-em-up out of the starting gate.  It builds the characters and illuminates them with some of the most kinetic "let's get the team together" movie making I have seen in a long time.  The performances are strong, the sets look great; again we are treated to new uniforms, a new Enterprise bridge, and so on), and the special effects are gorgeous.

Abrams understands the gravity of what he is dealing with; he is taking cultural heroes and not just re-casting and rebooting them.  He is also taking a beloved property with tens of thousands of fans and asking them to bless a new creation that obliterates much of the old.  Abram's new continuity is not at all what we have seen in the shows.  Its sole hold over is Spock-Prime, Nimoy reprising his iconic role.

He really makes it work.  I felt my nostalgia triggered again and again by Star Trek. All the inconsistencies (the hydraulic turbines in the Enterprise's engine room), all the unlikely escapes (Kirk runs to just the right place to do just the right thing that had never been done before), and all the old patterns ("Dammit Jim--") felt right at home.  Abrams has wisely decided not to be too clever. His fealty is saved for the old crew and the original formula; it isn't to the unwieldy mass that the creation later became.

His sense of action (apparently advised on by Spielberg) is just where it needs to be.  It feels modern while not moving into super-hero territory.  Perhaps, the story is both overly cosmic and yet a bit small-minded.  Do threats to entire planets and the whole Federation really come in such comparatively small packages?  Are the motivations enough to actually drive the behavior we see?  I'm not sure, but it doesn't matter.  If Abrams has a problem, it is that his villain isn't all that interesting, and he shores that up with Eric Bana's natural charisma.

I went in to Star Trek having heard it was good and thinking that in order to get an 'A', it would need to really show me something surprising and amazing.  And as I was carried along, I was thinking that, no, this was not 'it'.  It was very, very good; but it was also very, very 'Trek' with all the scientific fluff coming back in and the poorly designed star-ships with death-drop corridors huge unlikely machines.  It was a little past the middle that I realized something -- this wasn't just the re-telling of the material that had come before -- it was, in fact, taking the shape of Star Trek, but it was cleaving away the years of detritus that had grown up and then rebuilding it from the ground up.  It was not just going back to the original core, but also making it its own.

What it leaves us with is something new -- something that has the appeal of the old and the fresh promise of the original; and it does it convincingly; that was something I never thought I would see.

--

For more reviews please visit our film/television review section.

Star Trek images © Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved.